Why robotization of cleaning does not threaten people: debunking myths
Myth 1: “Robots reduce jobs.” This is one of the most common misconceptions. In reality, companies that implement robotic solutions are interested in retaining their employees. They invest in training, create new positions (such as operators and technicians), and expand the areas of responsibility for their staff. The result is a stable workforce and increased qualifications.
Myth 2: “Robots do all the work — humans are not needed.” In practice, robots can only handle some tasks well: wet cleaning, vacuuming, and moving along straight routes. Everything else is up to humans: quality assessment, cleaning areas that are inaccessible to machines, and removing difficult stains. In other words, robots help, but they do not replace humans.
Myth 3: “Robots are expensive and do not pay for themselves.” Yes, the initial investment in robotic technology can be significant. However, with proper calculation and planning, they pay for themselves within 12–18 months through savings on consumables, time, equipment wear and tear, and reduced human fatigue. In addition, machines allow you to avoid fines for poor cleaning.
Myth 4: “Automation = unemployment.” Modern companies understand that automation is not about layoffs, but optimization. Employees do not become unnecessary; they become more valuable. Cleaning is transforming from heavy manual labor into a controlled, technological, and intellectual process. This attracts new people to the profession and reduces staff turnover.